What other organizations can we partner with to expand into new areas of evidence synthesis ?

  • Campbell, JBI

  • BMJ, Annals of Internal Medicine, JAMA Internal Medicine

  • Pro-science, pro-evidence groups that are emerging due to the pandemic if disinformation

  • Campbell, JBI, EvidencePartners, EPPI-reviewer, Collaboration for Evironmenal Evidence, BEME

  • WHO

  • HTA organizations, research funding agencies

  • World Medical Education Federation, IFMSA

  • Welcome Trust, MQ, James Lind Alliance

  • Wikipedia / Scholarpedia / Scite

  • Campbell

  • Surgical societies

  • Universities, governments, foundations

  • Crossref for technical challenges

  • orthomolecular medicine

  • JBI

  • IHME GBD at U Washington

  • National health councils

  • McMaster

  • Local government and academic institutions

  • NICE, WHO, SIGN, CDC in the USA

  • WHO, NICE or similar global agencies

  • International Society of Bengal Studies; Global Voices

  • Campbell & Joanna Briggs

  • Disease specific charities

  • WHO, GRADE, MAGICapp, GIN/guideline groups

  • No tengo idea

  • NICE, WHO, McMaster, Campbell, EPPICentre

  • La academia

  • Scientific Knowledge Accelerator Foundation (gps.health), Computable Publishing LLC

  • OMS, CDC, international professional organizations considering the particular issues of each region

  • WHO, NIHR

  • International medical societies

  • Campbell, JBI, Guidelines International Network, AGREE Collaboration (Guidelines)

  • WHO

  • tiktok, instagram, amazon

  • health technology assessment agencies; government agencies

  • Independent non-governmental organizations of researchers and users of health technologies and pharmaceutical industry

  • African Evidence Network

  • Perhaps build stronger partnerships with national agencies and initiatives that also work on evidence syntheses

  • National institutes of sanitary technology evaluation

  • Education organizations

  • Universities

  • Technical organisationS working on climate change

  • Government-funded knowledge syntheses, like CADTH

  • Joanna Briggs

  • Future of Humanity Institute, The Centre for Humane Technology

  • Wellcome Trust; Evidence Aid; Greenpeace; Refugee council; WHO

  • Campbell, environmental evidenc

  • Campbell Collaboration, JBI, United Nations Foundations,,European Commission , World Bank, Different Development funds worldwide

  • Danish National Health Authority and HTA organizations in general

  • Patient support groups, patients themselves directly and authentically

  • none that i can think of....

  • Red Cross,

  • Campbell, Africa Centre for Evidence, Numerous national HTA agencies, this is a huge list

  • Guideline producers, Royal Colleges, GMC etc?

  • NICE. formal links with guideline developers so there is a clear route of action for Cochrane evidence - not just a partnership or 'understanding' an actual pathway to real demonstrable impact.

  • NICE, OHTAC, CADTH, ANZHN, AHRQ, USPSTF - government agencies; ECRI, BMJ, GRADE, ICER - other established groups who conduct/produce evidence reviews

  • policy think tanks and guideline producers, you need to co-publish recommendations as a separate product to the Cochrane review.

  • Joanna Briggs Institute

  • Campbell

  • national institutes of health, meta-science institutes (METRICS)

  • I'm not sure expanding is strategic, I think we should be consolidating our base, improving our efficiency, and strengthening key partnerships

  • WHO, charities such as the Diabetes Society who have a patient base

  • Bond University, McMaster University

  • good and transparent scientific societies

  • The JBI

  • Industry (all types, including SMEs)

  • who, universities

  • Get medical schools involved, esp to identify key knowledge gaps in practice

  • Regulatory agencies, Science/medical funding charities, Professional bodies

  • I think different scientific societies such as international Association of Epidemiology could really help

  • Cochrane should really just be a journal.

  • Do not know

  • Hahahaha

  • WHO, Global Fund, CDC among others

  • WHO, ECDC, EMA

  • professional societies

  • WHO

  • Media and social networks

  • working with evidence synthesis specialists in ecology/climate change

  • Campbell collaboration, CEE, WHO,

  • HTA , health decision makers

  • Environmental health research & policy organisations. Modelling methods experts.

  • We need to move our software to non-proprietary models that allow multiple groups to contribute to it

  • Technology assessment groups to build in cost effectiveness and applicability

  • Campbell Collaboration, EPPI centre, Joanna Briggs and guideline developers

  • WHO / Campbell / EUNETHTA network

  • Campbell

  • Campbell

  • Campbell Collaboration

  • campbell, specialised units at institutions

  • Campbell Collaboration , CEE

  • Disney

  • Other academic institutions conducting evidence syntheses, but is specific areas (e.g. Imperial College London on air pollution)

  • evidence gaps

  • Campbell